9911796707
TMI Blog2006 (6) TMI 526X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... f its body He has alleged that due to the negligence of the Bank, the sanctioned loan was not disbursed The respondent has however mentioned that for the release of loan amount he was required to deposit the required margin money, which he could not do Therefore, on his request the Bank returned all the papers and the amount deposited by him The Bank accordingly complied with his request. 2. Th ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ds pertaining to investigations of his complaint The Chief Manager, SBI, Shakur Basti Branch informed him on 31 12 2005 that: The matter is under consideration and we shall advise you accordingly very soon on the matter. Subsequently, on 19 1 2006, he was informed as under: We advise that we are not in position to accede to your request for supply of copies under RTI Act, as the matter is ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... er Section 8(2) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 and was informed accordingly that the matter being sub-judice at the time as well as now . 7. The case was heard on 29 6 2006. The complainant was represented by his Counsel, Shri Chandu Ram and the Bank was represented by its Counsel Shri S N Relan along with the official of the Bank. 8. Both the parties were heard. The complainant menti ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ed that there was no provision for inspection of the record in the Act This is contrary to the provision Under Section 2(f) (i). He has also not indicated as to why the report could not be disclosed, except that the matter was sub-judice There is no provision in the Act which restricts the disclosure of information merely on the ground of the fact that matter is pending with the Consumer Court. In ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
