2016 (11) TMI 1570

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... t: Shri Pawan Kumar Singh, Supdt. (A.R.) ORDER Per Mr. Anil G. Shakkarwar: The present appeal is preferred against Order-in-Original No.06/Commissioner/NOIDA/2006 dated 30.05.2006. 2.The appellant was employee of M/s Inalsa Appliances Ltd., who were issued with a show-cause-notice dated 30.06.2005. The show cause notice had a proposal for demanding Central Excise duty, amounting to Rs. 78,59, .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... appellant under Rule 209-A of Central Excise Rules, 1944 read with Rules 26 of Central Excise Rules, 2001/2002. Aggrieved by the said Order, the appellant is before this Tribunal. 3.Heard the learned counsel for the appellant, who has taken us through the impugned show cause notice, Order-in-Original and provisions of said Rules, 209-A and Rule 26. 4.Heard the Ld. DR for Revenue who has supporte .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X