2016 (8) TMI 1373

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nt : C.S.C.,C.B. Tripathi ORDER 1. Heard Sri Piyush Agrawal, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri C.B. Tripathi, learned Standing Counsel for respondents. 2. The order dated 04.03.2002 proposing re-assessment under Section 21 of U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948 (hereinafter referred to as the "Act, 1948") and notice dated 30.07.2002 for Assessment Years 1994-95 and 1995-96 have been challenged on .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nion, whether suo motu or on the basis of some subsequent judgment of Court would not justify to invoke Section 21. Re-assessment under Section 21 is permissible only if there is a case of escape assessment and not on change of opinion. 4. Learned Standing Counsel did not dispute that re-assessment proceedings have been initiated only on the basis of subsequent judgment and not otherwise. That be .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X