2018 (8) TMI 803

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Gyanendra Kumar Tripathi (AC) AR for Respondent ORDER Per: Archana Wadhwa After hearing both the sides represented by Shri Vineet Kumar Singh (Advocate) for the Appellant and Shri Gyanendra Kumar Tripathi, (AC) AR for the Revenue it is seen that Lower Authorities confirmed the demand against the appellant under the category of "Business Auxiliary Services" to the extent of Rs. 4,76,445/-. As .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... r (Appeals) has held that in the absence of any documentary support he feels handicapped to give any serious thought on the issue raised in the ground of appeal. 3. We find that the appellant, before us, has also not been able to substantiate their plea by production of relevant telephone bills or the purchase of goods orders etc. Appreciating the said fact as also the fact that the demand is muc .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X