2018 (8) TMI 1015

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... pondent ORDER Per: Ramesh Nair The brief facts of the case are that, the appellant entered into an agreement with M/s. Molex Mafatlal Micron Pvt. Limited to manufacture electronic connectors and cable harness on job work basis. As per the agreement, M/s. Molex Mafatlal Micron Pvt. Limited would provide raw materials to the appellant and the the job work would be done by them. The case of the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... he pointed out that the agreement is for the job work and not for supply of manpower. In support of his case, he placed reliance on the following judgments:- (a) Rameshchandra C. Patel vs. CST, Ahmd. - 2012 (25) STR 471 (Tri. Ahmd.) (b) Shivnarayan Bansal vs. CCE, Indore - 2013 (31) STR 747 (Tri. Del.) (c) K. Damodara Reddy vs. CCE, Tirupathi - 2010 (19) STR 591 (Tri. Bang.) (d) Hemant V. Desh .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... vity of the appellant is clearly falling under Manpower Recruitment or Supply Agency Service. 4. We have carefully considered the submissions made by both the sides and perused the record. We find that, though there are clauses in the agreement which binds the appellant regarding various compliances related their employees but the employees belongs to appellant only. The appellant has carried out .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X