2018 (9) TMI 604

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the case of S. A. Builders [2006 (12) TMI 82 - SUPREME COURT]. The Tribunal noted that undisputedly the loans and advances were given by the assessee to the subsidiary companies for the purpose of their business and there was no dispute that such advances were utilized by the subsidiaries for their businesses. No question of law in this regard therefore arises. Claim of depreciation on the leased .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... s not require consideration. Disallowance u/s 14(A) - Held that:- Tribunal had noted that the assessee had sufficient interest free funds for making investment in assets earning tax free income. It was in this background that the Tribunal deleted the disallownace but apportioned 2 lacs for administrative expenses. Here also no question of law arises therefore, tax appeal is dismissed.
MR. AKIL .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ₹ 46,35,567/under Section 14A of the Act to the extent of ₹ 2,00,000/? (D) Whether the Appellate Tribunal has erred in not following the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Maxopp Investment Ltd vs. CIT, New Delhi, which has applied the "theory of apportionment" of expenses (including interest) ?" 2. The fist question pertains to the addition under Section 36( .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... depreciation, inter alia, on the ground that the transaction was genuine. The assessee had demonstrated ownership of the assets, genuineness of the lease transaction, user of leased asset for the purpose of the business of earing lease rental. Such lease rental was accepted by the Assessing Officer and taxed the same. 4. Quite apart from such finding of the Tribunal regarding genuineness of the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... acs as compared to much larger disallowance made by the Assessing Officer. In this context the Tribunal had noted that the assessee had sufficient interest free funds for making investment in assets earning tax free income. It was in this background that the Tribunal deleted the disallownace but apportioned ₹ 2 lacs for administrative expenses. Here also no question of law arises therefore, .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X