2016 (10) TMI 1227

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... sp;    For The Respondent :  Shri Ranjan Khanna,  A.R. ORDER Per Archana Wadhwa: After hearing both the sides, we find that the service tax stands confirmed against the appellant on the alleged service of renting of immovable property provided by them during the period October, 2008 to September, 2009. 2. Ld. Advocate appearing for the appellant submits that they are .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ion would not be available to the Revenue. 3. The ld. DR appearing for the Revenue accepts the applicability of the said  decision of the Tribunal as regards limitation. 4. Inasmuch as admittedly a part of demand falls within the limitation period, we set aside the impugned order and remand the matter to the original adjudicating authority for requantifying the demand within the limitation .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X