2018 (9) TMI 1433

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ut addressing itself as to whether in the present case that formula was applicable at all or when adverting or even taking into consideration the appellant’s submissions on the merits with respect to the inapplicability of the Settlement Commission’s formula in the context of its submissions that the period in question involved a separate product. This Court is of the opinion that the remand or .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... . Respondent Through: Mr. Harpreet Singh, Sr. Standing Counsel for respondent with Mr. Suresh Chaudhary, Advocate. O R D E R CM APPL. 27734/2018 (for exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CEAC 32/2018 CM APPL. 27733/2018 (for stay) Issue notice. Mr. Harpreet Singh, Sr. Standing Counsel for the respondent accepts notice. The appellant s griev .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... rcentage of Snuff contained in the weight of tobacco. It complains before this Court that the appeal for the later period, which according to it concerns a separate product i.e. Premium Khaini , did not even consider the basic contentions with respect to the entirely different ratio of raw materials. This Court has considered the submissions of the parties. The Tribunal, at the very outset, me .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X