2012 (2) TMI 662

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... rict Judge, Bangalore, Karnataka where the assets/properties of the Judgment Debtors ('JDs') are stated to be situated. The alternative prayer is for a direction that the present execution petition be transferred to the Court of the learned District Judge, Bangalore, Karnataka. 2. In terms of the Award dated 10th October 2011 the JDs are liable to pay the Decree Holder ('DH') a .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ould be the Court which had entertained the application under Section 34 of the Act, which was the District Court at Golaghat, and therefore an order of transfer of the decree from the District Court at Golaghat to this Court had to be obtained by the DH. The said objection was overruled by holding that the territorial jurisdiction for execution is determined by the locus of the JD or the property .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... y provision in the 1996 Act making the Arbitral Tribunal a Court which passed the decree and in the absence of any provision anywhere making the court within whose jurisdiction an award was passed as the court which passed the decree, it is not open for any executing Court (i) either to demand transmission from any other Court; (ii) or to order transmission to any other Court. 5. In the light .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X