Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2000 (8) TMI 63

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... of Income-tax (Appeals) (in short, the "CIT(A)"). An order under section 154 of the Act was passed by the Assessing Officer holding that interest allowed to the assessee under section 244A(1) was not allowable and had been allowed by mistake. The stand of the assessee that the action was not permissible under section 154 was not accepted. The assessee filed an appeal before the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) which yielded no relief to it. On further appeal, the Tribunal held that section 154 did not apply to a case of this nature. The factual position which is undisputed is as follows: For the assessment year in question, the return was processed under section 143(1)(a) on March 19, 1993, on a total returned income of Rs. 1,69,71,48 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nal held that this was not a case which was covered under section 154. In support of the appeal, learned counsel for the Revenue submitted that the Tribunal has erred in its view that section 154 has no application. According to him, the position was clear in law and therefore interest which has been wrongly allowed had been rightly withdrawn. A bare look at section 154 of the Act makes it clear that a "mistake apparent from the record" is rectifiable. In order to attract the application of section 154, the mistake must exist and the same must be apparent from the record. The power to rectify the mistake, however, does not cover cases where a revision or review of the order is intended. "Mistake" means to take or understand wrongly or in .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... by the apex court in Master Construction Co. (P.) Ltd. v. State of Orissa [1966] 17 STC 360, an error which is apparent from the record should be one which is not an error which depends for its discovery on elaborate arguments on questions of fact or law. A similar view was also expressed in Satyanarayan Laxminarayan Hegde v. Mallikarjun Bhavanappa Tirumale [1960] AIR 1960 SC 137. It is to be noted that the language used in Order 47, rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (in short "the CPC"), is different from the language used in section 154 of the Act. The power is given to various authorities to rectify any mistake "apparent from record" under section 154 of the Act. In the Civil Procedure Code, the words are "an error apparent on .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ated cannot be corrected by way of rectification. On the facts of the present case, we find that there was no mistake apparent from the record which could be rectified under section 154 of the Act. The questions proposed deal with conclusions on the facts giving rise to no question of law. The Tribunal recorded the following findings with reference to the submissions made before it : "10. Learned counsel for the assessee invited our attention on the provisions of the Act. It was stated that clause (b) of section 244A(1) provides that where refund is out of tax other than advance tax or tax treated as paid under section 199 or tax collected at source, the interest is to be paid at 1 per cent. for every month or part of a month comprised in .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ctober 31, 1989, issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes wherein it is stated that interest is to be allowed on the basis of refund due as a result of intimation issued under section 143(1)(a). 13 . It transpires from the perusal of the impugned order that an attempt was made to make interpretation of section 244A. There is no clear-cut mandate in the section by which the Assessing Officer can deny interest to the assessee on the amounts paid under section 140A. Therefore, the question a propos the chargeability of interest is a debatable question. The Supreme Court has held that debatable questions fall beyond the scope of section 154. As such, in our opinion, the Assessing Officer was not correct in withdrawing the amount of interest .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates