9911796707
TMI Blog1948 (8) TMI 26X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... case is: Whether there is a change in the persons carrying on the business within the meaning of Section 8(1) of the Excess Profits Tax Act, 1940, when the business which was previously carried on and owned by the Hindu undivided family and a stranger is on desruption of the family being carried on and owned by a partnership composed of the members of the quondam family and the stranger. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... his Act except for the purposes of determining the amount of the statutory percentage to have been discontinued, and a new business to have been commenced. In Section 2, clause (17), person is defined as including a Hindu undivided family. The legal position in this case before the disruption of the joint family was that there were two persons carrying on a business, namely, (1) P. Pachayap ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... contention is obviously unsound having regard to well established principles of Hindu law. Their Lordships of the Judicial Committee in Pichappa Chettiar v. Chokkalingam Pillai [1934] 67 MLJ 366accepted as correct the following proposition of law in Mayne's Hindu law (9th edition) at page 398:- Where a managing member of a joint family enters into a partnership with a stranger, the other ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... f Income-tax, Madras [1944] 12 ITR 97 (Mad.), are apposite in this connection: When a Hindu joint family separates and its members carry on the family business in partnership, there is a change in ownership. The business is no longer owned by the joint family but by the firm, an entirely different entity, and the fact that as before the profits continue to be divided equally between the same ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the subject of a reference, depending, as it does, entirely on the grant of a concession in accordance with instructions from the Government. We cannot accede to this request on behalf of the petitioner. The answer to the question framed is that in the circumstances set out in the question, there is a change in the persons carrying on the business within the meaning of Section 8(1) of the Exce ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
