Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2017 (9) TMI 1772

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... igh Court in Smt. Beena K. Jain [1993 (11) TMI 7 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT] we hold that the assessee has fulfilled the condition laid down in section 54F of the Act. Accordingly, we cancel the order u/s 263 passed by the CIT - Decided in favour of assessee
SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH (JUDICIAL MEMBER) AND SHRI N.K. PRADHAN (ACCOUNTANT MEMBER) For the Appellant : Shri Shrey Sushil Joshi, AR For the Respondent : Shri N.P. Singh, CIT(DR) ORDER PER N.K. PRADHAN, A.M. This is an appeal filed by the assessee. The relevant assessment year is 2009-10. The appeal is directed against the order u/s 263 of the Income Tax Act 1961, (the 'Act') passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax(CIT)-17, Mumbai. 2. The 1st ground raised by the assessee in this appeal is .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ion u/s 54 to the tune of ₹ 48,00,313/- by purchasing properties at Poornima Building. He filed a Paper Book (P/B) showing the relevant dates in respect of the above transactions. Reference was also made by him to the following clauses of the agreement in respect of properties at Poornima Building: (i) clause 2 of the above agreement clearly states that unless the balance consideration of ₹ 34,00,000/- was received by 21.11.2007, the agreement would stand cancelled even if it was registered with the Sub Registrar of Assurances. (ii) sub clause (g) of clause 3 of the agreement states that the transferee (assessee) would be put into quiet and peaceful possession of the said premises only after making full payment to the transfe .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... rty at Poornima Building, the following facts emerge from the documents filed by the assessee in the P/B. Particulars Date Amount (Rs.) Page of the P/B Agreement for sale 17.09.2007 6,00,000/- 31-50 Loan sanctioned by Bank of Baroda 01.10.2007 22-25 Bank of Baroda Cheque date 08.10.2007 34,00,000/- 26 Date of handing over possession 10.10.2007 27-28 We also find that the agreement for sale of the flat at Runwal Towers was entered on 07.10.2008 in place of 17.10.2008 mentioned by the CIT in the order u/s 263 dated 04.03.2014 passed by him. That the date is 07.10.2008 is evident on the face of 'Agreement for Sale'. A similar issue arose before the Hon'ble Bombay High Court in Smt. Beena K. Jain (supra). In that case the as .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates