9911796707
TMI Blog2019 (1) TMI 521X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... t, Member (Judicial) For The Appellant : Mr. Arun Kathpalia, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rajesh P, Ms. Bani Brar, Mr. Prasanth Jain, Mr. Samaksh Goyal and Mr. Siddharth Nath, Advocates. For The Respondent : Dr. U.K. Chaudhary, Senior Advocate with Mr. Himanshu Vij and Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, Advocates JUDGMENT SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA, J. 'M/s. Acquisory Consulting LLP' claimed to be the 'Op ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... o an Engagement Letter dated 5th September, 2013 written by the Appellant to suggest that in terms of discussions with respect to assistance as was sought for raising debt amounting to Rs. 150 Crores from Non-Banking Financial Companies or Private Banks in 'M/s. BCC Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.' for construction of the project at Ghaziabad and repayment of debentures to HDFC PMS, the Appellant quoted ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... and he was also the signatory to the financial statements of the 'Corporate Debtor' during his tenure as well as properly authorized to sign the Engagement Letter. Engagement Letter is documented in E-mail dated 16th September, 2013, from Appellant to Mr. S.P Singh. Further, the assignment letter assigning the said Engagement Letter to the Appellant was signed by Mr. S.P. Singh who is none other t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ghlighted certain facts by the Appellant has failed to bring on record any document to suggest that the Appellant has rendered services to the 'Corporate Debtor' as observed above. Thus there being a disputed question of fact, the Adjudicating Authority had rightly refused to entertain application under Section 9 preferred by the Appellant. We find no merit in this appeal. It is accordingly dismis ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
