9911796707
TMI Blog2019 (2) TMI 263X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... failed to notice the aforesaid fact. This apart, once it was agreed by the ‘corporate debtor’ to pay the amount of ₹ 3,80,000/- being satisfied and having paid the amount, the Adjudicating Authority was wrong in passing order to refund the amount of ₹ 1,80,000 to ‘corporate debtor’ - appeal allowed - decided in favor of appellant. - CP (IB) NO. 618/CB/2018 - - - Dated:- 6-12-2018 - ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... pany. The details of expenses have been given by the IRP, but no receipts of amount are furnished. During the visit at Lucknow, a company secretary Lekhraj Bajaj, who stayed for 4 days in Lucknow, has charged ₹ 30,000+6300 GST as fees of Company Secretary. It is further stated in the application that Chartered Accountant Mr. Sanjeev Kumar also came and stayed four days in Lucknow and he ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ched between the parties and there was no default on the part of the corporate debtor , set aside the order of admission and remitted the matter to the Adjudicating Authority to fix the fee of Interim Resolution Professional . Pursuant to such remand, the impugned order has been passed by the Adjudicating Authority directing the Resolution Professional to refund of ₹ 1,80,000/-, though t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... nt of ₹ 3,80,000/- being satisfied and having paid the amount, the Adjudicating Authority was wrong in passing order to refund the amount of ₹ 1,80,000 to corporate debtor . 5. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent submitted that composite invoice of ₹ 6,80,000/- was submitted by the Resolution Professional . Learned counsel for the Resolution Professional ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
