2017 (8) TMI 1506

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ifiable under CTH 84717030 and therefore is not eligible for the benefit of the notification - Held that:- The issue whether the imported goods are classifiable under CTH 84717020 has been analyzed and discussed in the case of CESTAT, Delhi in M/s. Supertron Electronics Pvt. Ltd. [2017 (1) TMI 1529 - CESTAT NEW DELHI], where it was held in favor of respondent by classifying the goods under CTH 847 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... and therefore is not eligible for the benefit of the notification. The respondent paid the differential duty under protest. After adjudication, the original authority passed the order confirming the classification of the goods under CTH 84717030 and denying the benefit of the Notification. Aggrieved, the respondents filed appeal before Commissioner (Appeals), who set aside the order passed by the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X