TMI Blog2019 (4) TMI 810X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... issioner of Central Excise, Jaipur – I”. It is submitted that the correct respondent is to be shown as “Central Excise & CGST Commissionerate, Alwar”. Held that:- The appeal was filed by M/s KEI Industries and at the relevant time, the jurisdiction of the appellant was within the Commissionerate of Central Excise, Jaipur – I. The miscellaneous order dated 03/08/2018 has also reflected the responde ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... llant for rectification of certain mistakes claimed in the final order dated 14/06/2016. Vide the miscellaneous order dated 03/08/2018, the Tribunal dismissed the miscellaneous application. 2. The present application has been filed by Revenue praying that certain mistakes in the order may be corrected. It is the submission by the learned Departmental Representative that in the case title framed i ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|