Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2019 (4) TMI 946

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Only a price which declared by the assessee and accepted by the department, the bill of entry thereof can only be taken as price of contemporaneous goods. The enhancement of the price and consequential demand, interest etc. are not sustainable - Appeal allowed - decided in favor of appellant.
MR. RAMESH NAIR, MEMBER (JUDICIAL) And MR. RAJU, MEMBER (TECHNICAL) Shri. Hardik Modh (Adv.) for Appellant Shri. L. Patra (A.R.) for Respondent ORDER PER: RAMESH NAIR The brief facts of the case are that the appellant M/s Chirag International has filed Bill of Entry No. 114753 dated 18.06.2007 and 115328 dated 09.07.2007 for the import of White Poppy Seed from Turkey Origin. Since, there was an alert from the Directorate of Valuation regarding .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... edetermination of value, finalization of assessment and confirmation of differential duty, interest demands and demands. Therefore, the present appeal. 2. Sh. Hardik Modh, Ld. Counsel along with Shri Hasmukh Kundalia, Ld. Advocate appeared for the appellant. Sh. Hardik Modh submits that except the alert notice there is no any evidence to reject the declared value of the imported goods. The SCN relied upon contemporaneous import under Bill of Entry No. 788858/6607 and 788859/6607 wherein the price of USD 2700 PMT was taken. He submits that this price was not a declared price whereas it was a disputed price and enhanced price by the customs. It is a settled law that due to dispute any enhanced price cannot be taken as price of contemporaneou .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... hey Shyam Ratanlal vs Commr. of Customs 2005 (190) ELT 244 (Tri. Del.) * Bayer India Ltd. Vs Commr. of Customs 2006 (198) ELT 240 (Tri. Mum.) * Kanhaiyalal & Co. vs Commr. of Customs 2003 (151) ELT 674 (Tri. Mum.) * Indian Farmers Fertilizer Co-op. Ltd. Vs CCE 2010 (262) ELT 523 (Tri. Kol.) * Jabs International P. Ltd. Vs Commr. of Customs 2016 (338) ELT 723 (Tri. Mum.) 3. On the other hand, Sh. L. Patra, Ld. Assistant Commissioner (AR) appearing on behalf of the Revenue reiterates the findings of the impugned order. He submits that enhancement were done not only on the basis of public ledger but also on contemporaneous bill of entry, therefore, among both the price, the lowest price declared in the contemporaneous Bill of Entry i. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... dispute and enhanced out of such dispute cannot be taken as a price of contemporaneous goods. Only a price which declared by the assessee and accepted by the department, the bill of entry thereof can only be taken as price of contemporaneous goods. Moreover, the enhancement of the price in the case of Laxmi Trading Co., the case was before the Tribunal and the enhancement was set aside by the Tribunal in the case of Ajay Exports and others including the Laxmi Trading Co. (supra) therefore on both the count i.e. either the international price published in the public ledger or contemporaneous price of Laxmi Trading Co., the enhancement is incorrect and illegal. As regard the judgments relied upon by the Ld. AR, we find that the absolutely ide .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates