Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2019 (5) TMI 98

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... examining whether the details of payees are furnished before the prescribed Income-tax authority in the prescribed form and within the prescribed time as per section 194(7). iii. The Ld.CIT(A) erred in taking into account additional evidence relating to 'Freight charges details uploaded' in contravention of Rule 46A of the Income Tax Rules. iv. For these and other grounds that may be urged upon, the order of the CIT(A) may be reversed and that assessment order be restored. v. The appellant craves leave to add, alter, amend or delete any other grounds on or before hearing of the appeal". 3. The Assessee is a company engaged in the business of manufacture and dealer in edible and non-edible oils and its by products. In the course of assessment proceedings the AO noticed that the Assessee had made payment of a sum of Rs. 6,62,65,573/- to various transporters and the expenditure incurred in this regard was claimed as deduction in computing income from business of the Assessee. The details of which are as follows: Details of Freight: Carriage inward 2,29,93,188.00 Carriage outward 1,73,65,367.00 Consignment freight 2,58,67,855.00   6,62,26,410.00 4. Admittedly, .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ned by the assessee. 7. On appeal by the assessee, the CIT(Appeals) deleted the addition made by the AO except in respect of a sum of Rs. 99,04,607, for the following reasons. "6b. I have carefully perused the submissions and Board's Circular No. 19/2015. During the appeal proceedings before me, the AR stresses on the statement of facts and relied on CBDT Circular No. 19/2015 dated 27/11/2015. The details submitted are perused and considered. Details of lorry freight uploaded/not uploaded is tabulated as under: Particulars Amount (Rs) Amount (Rs) Freight paid as per order   6,62,65,573       Less: Below Rs. 75,000     H S Road Lines, Mumbai 72,695   Lakshmi Transports, Mng 63,729   Latha Narayana Transports 69,552   Neha Roadlines 55,720   Sree Guru Transports 47,195   Univercel Logistics 64,860 3,73,751 Lorry Freight details to be uploaded   6,58,91,822 Less: Lorry freight details uploaded   5,59,87,215 Balance details not uploaded   99,04,607 6c. In the instant case, the appellant is not carrying on transportation business, further CBDT vide Circular No. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 2015 (w.e.f. 01-06-2015, it was reading as follows:- "(6) No deduction shall be made from any sum credited or paid or likely to be credited or paid during the previous year to the account of a contractor during the course of business of plying, hiring or leasing goods carriages, on furnishing of his Permanent Account Number, to the person paying or crediting such sum." 23. A plain reading of the above sub-section makes it amply clear that on the Contractor undertaking Transport of Goods in course of his Transport Business, furnishing PAN to the person making such payment/credit, the payee shall not be required to effect TDS from such payment to the Transporter. On furnishing the PAN No. from the recipient Transporter- Contractor, the immunity from making TDS under sec. 194C(1) shall be available to all payers by virtue of 194C(6), in relation to all Goods Transport Charges irrespective of the fact, whether it was under a Contract or a Sub-contract. 24. We wish to refer profitably to Para No. 49.3 of CBDT Circular No. 05 2010 F.No.142/13/2010-S0 (TPL), dated 3rd June, 2010 (Explanatory Notes on Finance Act (No.2) 2009), where under the PAN based immunity and exemption from ma .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... it clear that that during the relevant Assessment year, if the sub-contractors have supplied their PAN to the person making payments in respect of hiring/leasing/of vehicles during the course of his business, then such person making such payment shall not deduct any TDS. It is only by way of subsequent amendment by Finance Act, 2015 (w.e.f. 01-06-2015), the expression "where such contractor owns ten or less goods carriages at any time during the previous year and furnishes a declaration to that effect along with" was substituted in the place of "on furnishing of" thereby introducing the requirement of the declaration to the effect indicated by the amendment. Therefore, under Sec. 194C(6), as it stood prior to the amendment in 2015 in order to get immunity from the obligation of TDS, filing of PAN of the Payee-Transporter alone is sufficient and no confirmation letter as required by the learned CIT is required. 26. On the aspect of observation of the learned CIT that Sections 194C(6) and Section 194C(7) have to be read together to extend the immunity from TDS, our attention is drawn to the fact that though the Finance Act, (No.2) 2009 introduced, inter alia, Sec. 194C(6) and 194C( .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ay be prescribed. 27. From the above, it could be observed that only slight modification had been introduced as to the procedure by replacing "declaration" with the words "Permanent Account Number" as the thing to be obtained from the Transporter. We are, therefore, inclined to hold that the provisions of Section 194C(6) and 194C(7) are similar to the Proviso (2) and (3) of the pre-amended Section 194C(3), and on this premise we shall proceed to examine whether Section 194C(6) and 194C(7) are to be read together to invoke provisions under section 40(a)(ia) of the Act. 28. After drawing an analogy between the pre-amended proviso between Clause (2) and Clause (3) of section 194C(3) and the present amended section 194C(6) and 194C(7), Learned AR submitted that even on earlier occasions when the declaration obtained in Form 15 I ( requirement similar to the PAN particulars under Sec.194C(6)) obtained from the Transporter under Second Proviso is not submitted in Form 15J to the Commissioner of Income Tax in Form 15J (requirement similar as is provided under the third proviso and equivalent to the requirement Sec. 194C(7), the Department made attempts to make additions, but such ad .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates