2018 (7) TMI 1966

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ndent Assessee's appeal before it by following the decisions of this Court in CIT v. Continental Warehousing Corporation (Nhava Sheva) Ltd. [ 2015 (5) TMI 656 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT] and CIT (Central), Nagpur v. Murli Agro Products Ltd. [ 2010 (10) TMI 1052 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT] . Therefore, the issue so far as this Court is concerned, the question on merits would stand concluded favour of the R .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... s Appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act), challenges the order dated 24.6.2015 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (the Tribunal). The impugned order dated 24.6.2015 is in respect of Assessment Year 200607. 2 Mr. Chhotaray, the learned counsel for the Revenue urges the following questions of law, for our consideration: ( a) .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e's appeal before it by following the decisions of this Court in CIT v. Continental Warehousing Corporation (Nhava Sheva) Ltd. [2015] 374 ITR 645 (Bom) and CIT (Central), Nagpur v. Murli Agro Products Ltd. [2014] 49 Taxmann. Com 172 (Bom). Therefore, the issue so far as this Court is concerned, the question on merits would stand concluded favour of the Respondent Assessee and against the App .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X