2019 (5) TMI 1246

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nt/Revenue : Shri Mohd. Altaf, Assistant Commissioner (AR) For The Respondent : Shri Anurag Mishra, Advocate And Ms. Pragya Pandey, Advocate ORDER Per: Anil G. Shakkarwar After hearing both the sides duly represented by Shri Mohammad Altaf, learned Assistant Commissioner (AR) appearing on behalf of the Revenue & Shri Anurag Mishra, Advocate and Ms. Pragya Pandey, Advocate both appearing on b .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Original Authority confirming demand. We have also gone through the grounds of appeal. We do not find any contention by Revenue in respect of non-applicability of said clarification issued through letter dated 28/02/2006 by Joint Secretary TRU, Central Board of Excise & Customs, New Delhi. We therefore, do not find any merit in the appeal filed by Revenue. Appeal filed by Revenue is rejected. ( .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X