Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2019 (5) TMI 1317

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... of rent payment - assessee had failed to furnish any documentary evidence with regard to his claim of payment of rent to the 7 persons as recorded in the assessment order - HELD THAT:- No evidence of ownership of the property by these persons was furnished. The assessee had also failed to furnish the copies of lease a agreements. In these circumstances, the genuineness of the claim of deduction pertaining to rent expenditure remained unverified. Even during the course of appellate proceedings, no evidence of ownership of property by the 7 persons to whom the rent was claimed to have been paid was furnished. Out of the 3 persons in whose names the electricity bills were filed only one person figured in the list of 7 persons to whom the rent .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... that Assessee e-filed his return of income on 29.11.2014 declaring income of ₹ 16,62,690/-. The case of the assessee was selected for scrutiny under CASS and notice u/s. 143(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short "Act") was issued on 28.8.2015. The notice u/s. 143(2) of the Act was also sent on e-mail and thereafter notices u/s. 142(1) of the Act alongwith questionnaire was issued on 6.7.2016, 6.9.2016, 20.9.2016, 14.1.2016 and 14.12.2016, in response to the notice, the AR of the assessee filed necessary information and details. The written submissions filed alongwith necessary documents and explanations. During the assessment proceedings, the AO noted that assessee has granted interest free loan of ₹ 93,16,718/- to various p .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ow the threshold limit for TDS deduction, therefore, no TDS has been deducted from rent payment and no lease agreement is available. AO further observed that since the assessee has failed to file any documentary evidence regarding rent/ lease deed and also the ownership documents of the parties to whom rent have been paid. As such the assessee has failed to prove the genuineness of his claim of rent of ₹ 6,85,300/-, therefore, the claim of payment of rent of ₹ 6,85,300/- was held as non-genuine and the same was disallowed and added back to the return income of the assessee. Accordingly, the AO completed the assessment at ₹ 34,66,000/- vide order dated 23.12.2016 u/s. 143(3) of the Act. Against the assessment order, the as .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... her with regard to addition of ₹ 6,85,300/- on account of factory rent expenses is concerned, Ld. counsel for the assessee submitted that the parties have legal right in the property on which the factory of the assessee is running, however, the said building is an ancestral property located in Lal Dora area, so the shares of the owners are not individually defined and transferred through registered deeds. It was also submitted that there is no implication of TDS on the said payments since they are below the specified threshold limit as defined in section 194I and as per the provision of section 30 as laid down in the Act, rent is an allowable expenditure if the building is used for the business purposes. Hence, he requested to delete .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... oncerned, it is noted that assessee had failed to furnish any documentary evidence with regard to his claim of payment of rent to the 7 persons as recorded in the assessment order. No evidence of ownership of the property by these persons was furnished. The assessee had also failed to furnish the copies of lease a agreements. In these circumstances, the genuineness of the claim of deduction pertaining to rent expenditure remained unverified. Even during the course of appellate proceedings, no evidence of ownership of property by the 7 persons to whom the rent was claimed to have been paid was furnished. Out of the 3 persons in whose names the electricity bills were filed only one person figured in the list of 7 persons to whom the rent pai .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates