9911796707
TMI Blog1996 (6) TMI 85X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... n the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that for non-production of all the partners, the Income-tax Officer had no means to ascertain the existence of a genuine firm and, therefore, was right in cancelling the registration allowed ? " The assessee is a firm registered under the Partnership Act. For the assessment years 1979-80, 1980-81, 1981-82 and 1982-83, the Income-tax Officer passed orders under section 186(1) of the Act. He found that the firm was allowed registration earlier with eight partners as named in the order passed by the Income-tax Officer. On August 30, 1985, the Income-tax Officer visited the premises of the firm and among other things he found that the signatures of the three p ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ssee-firm preferred further appeal before the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal. The contention of the assessee before the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal was that the firm had been found to be genuine and in existence before the Income-tax Officer had allowed registration earlier vide order dated March 20, 1982. The signatures of the persons after a long time might vary. Some other submissions had also been made before the Appellate Tribunal. The Appellate Tribunal, however, found that the difference in the signature was not the ground for cancellation of registration as the Income-tax Officer found that the assessee was unable to produce the other partners before him for examination. The Appellate Tribunal came to the conclusion that the Income ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... sequent registration and also the submission of Mr. Bhuyan that the registration was refused, we do not find anything on the record. In the absence of anything on the record it will be difficult for us to hold that subsequently the firm was registered on production of the partners. Equally, it will be difficult for this court to hold that it was also rejected. Under section 186 of the Act, if where a firm has been registered, or its registration has effect under sub-section (7) of section 184 for an assessment year, the Income-tax Officer is of opinion that there was during the previous year no genuine firm in existence as registered, he may, after giving the firm a reasonable opportunity of being heard and with the previous approval of the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
