Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2019 (7) TMI 545

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ointed it out, immediately filed petition for rectification u/s 154 along with explanation stating that it is an inadvertent error. The decision in the case of Price Waterhouse Coopers Private Limited [ 2012 (9) TMI 775 - SUPREME COURT] is also identical where in the tax audit report filed by the assessee, it was indicated that provision towards payment of gratuity was not allowable, but the assessee therein failed to add the said provision to total income. Considering the said fact, the Hon ble Supreme Court held that no penalty could be imposed for such mistake. As noted by the CIT(A) as well as the Tribunal, the conduct of the assessee clearly establishes that it is an inadvertent error and cannot be stated to be a contumacious conduct o .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e appellant/Revenue; and Mr.A.S.Sriraman, learned counsel for the respondent/assessee. 4.With the consent on either side, the appeal itself is taken up for disposal. 5.The first substantial question of law raised by the Revenue is whether the Tribunal is correct in holding that penalty levied under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act is not attracted even if the assessee had claimed unpaid interest to the schedule bank in its profit and loss account and failed to disallow the same under Section 43B(e) of the Act. 6.The second question which has been raised by the Revenue is whether the Tribunal was correct in holding that the assessee is not guilty of furnishing inaccurate particulars. 7.The assessee filed return of income for the assessment y .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... of Income-tax (Appeals)-1, Chennai ("the CIT(A)", for brevity). Before the CIT(A), the assessee contended that this amount was clearly disclosed by the assessee in the audit report, that is, in point no.11 of the statutory audit report, dated 15.05.2012, and in page no.14 of the annual report for the financial year 2011-12, which was filed along with the return. The said record was also placed before the CIT(A). The assessee further stated that it is a bona fide error, inasmuch as this amount and details were disclosed by the assessee in the documents along with the return of income. It was further submitted that the returned loss of the assessee is ₹ 14.95 crores and the assessee has substantial carry forward losses also and conseque .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... he Sick Industrial Companies Act. Further, the Tribunal noted the reply given by the assessee stating that the term loan obligations and interest commitments have been met in full with respect to the State Bank of India in accordance with the terms and conditions of the sanction letter. However, the assessee has defaulted in repayments of term loans amounting to ₹ 0.22 crores and interest commitments amounting to ₹ 1.55 crores with respect to HDFC Bank's borrowings and that the term loan repayment is pending since February, 2012 while the interest commitment remains unpaid since January, 2011. The other relevant details with regard to the loan transaction with the HDFC Bank was also mentioned in the reply. After considering .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... n inadvertent error. The decision in the case of Price Waterhouse Coopers Private Limited (supra) is also identical where in the tax audit report filed by the assessee, it was indicated that provision towards payment of gratuity was not allowable, but the assessee therein failed to add the said provision to total income. Considering the said fact, the Hon'ble Supreme Court held that no penalty could be imposed for such mistake. The operative portion of the judgment reads as follows:- "18.The fact that the Tax Audit Report was filed along with the return and that it unequivocally stated that the provision for payment was not allowable under Section 40A(7) of the Act indicates that the assessee made a computation error in its return of .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates