Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

1995 (9) TMI 63

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... de. The appellant is shown as the third accused in the said first information report and the concern of which he is the proprietor is the first accused. It refers to a complaint by the Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, Headquarters (Administration), II, Madras. According to the complaint, it was found in a search of his office premises that he had forged the income-tax challans purported to have been issued by Indian Bank, Sowcarpet Branch, with regard to four of his clients and on a suspicion of the challans, the matter was cross-checked by the Assistant Commissioner. On that basis, the first information report was filed stating that the appellant had forged to the extent of Rs. 3,25,857. The details of the assessees are also set out in t .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nder section 288(1) of the Income-tax Act. Article III. -- That the said Sri Narendra Kumar Mohnot having his office in the name and style of ' Mohnot and Co.' at No. 38, College Road, Nungambakkam, Madras-6, has fraudulently obtained/tried to obtain income-tax refunds in the name of non-existent business concerns by producing bogus tax deduction certificates. Thus, Sri Narendra Kumar Mohnot has committed grave misconduct for which he is liable to be disqualified under section 288(5)(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, to represent an assessee under section 288(1) of the Income-tax Act." In the statement of imputa tion of misconduct sent along with the articles of charge shown in annexure-II, the relevant facts are set out As regards art .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... because of the initiation of t he criminal proceedings, the disciplinary action should be stopped till the disposal of the criminal proceedings. In this appeal, the only contention urged by learned counsel for the appellant is that the disciplinary action should be stopped till the criminal proceedings initiated against the appellant are concluded. Learned counsel places reliance in this connection on the judgment of the Supreme Court in Kusheshwar Dubey v. Bharath Cooking Coal Ltd., AIR 1988 SC 2118 ; [1989] 74 FJR 86 and P. J. Sunderarajan v. Unit Trust of India [1993] 1 LLJ 168. In the former case, the court found that the criminal action and the disciplinary proceedings were grounded upon the same set of facts and the court expressed .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... wn any general guideline. " In the latter case, the court found that in the enquiry before the criminal court many witnesses had already been examined and it expected the trial to be completed within three months. In those circumstances, the court granted stay of all further proceedings in the disciplinary enquiry. Learned counsel invities our attention to the judgment of a learned single judge of this court in P. J. Sunderarajan v. Deputy General Manager, Unit Trust of India, Madras [1990] 11 MLJ 51, That judgment was reversed by a Division Bench of this court and the judgment of the Division Bench was challenged in P. J. Sundararajan v. Unit Trust of India [1993] 1 LLJ 168 referred to earlier, before the Supreme Court. We have already .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... known how long the criminal proceedings would take. Further, the appellant is not the only accused in the criminal court. There are as many as nine accused in the said proceedings. In the facts and circumstances of the case, we do not find any justification for accepting the prayer of the appellant and stopping the disciplinary proceedings till the disposal of the proceedings in the criminal court. It goes without saying that in the disciplinary proceedings, evidence has to be adduced and the enquiry officer has to be satisfied that the charges are made out. If the enquiry officer finds sufficient evidence to prove the charges, then the further proceedings shall follow. Taking into consideration the fact that the appellant is an income-tax .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates