Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2000 (1) TMI 1023

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e tills Court that the petitioner had made the highest bid for all the items notwithstanding which the respondent Corporation and its functionaries for ulterior motives had accepted the bid of the petitioner for a few items only. On such statement of Mr. Agrawal, this Court had directed the Corporation and its functionaries to file counter-affidavit explaining the reasons for not giving the contract to the petitioner for all the items, and instead gave the contract for the remaining items to persons who had made bid at lower rates. In that view of the matter, learned cousel for the Corporation was directed to file a counter-affidavit which has since been filed. The said order dated 3-12-99 of this Court is set out hereinbelow for the facili .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... respondents without further reference to Bench. Let copy of this order be served on Mr. J. P. Karn, Sr. SCCG. Put up after three weeks. 3. It is manifest 3 from a persual of the counter affidavit as well as the submissions of Mr. Tekriwal, learned counsel for the Corporation, that the petitioner had not made the highest bid for all the times. His tender was accepted for the items for which his bid was the highest, and the contract for the remaining items were given to those of the tenderers who had made the highest offers. Mr. Tekriwal very fairly shows from the chart that there was a nitnor type graphical error with regard to one item which had resulted in a loss of an inconsequential sum of ₹ 20/- to the Corporation. Mr. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... equivocally admits his mistake, submits unconditional apology, and promises responsible behaviour in future, This court, is In no doubt that Mr. R. K. Agrawal had purposely and with sinister motive misled this court resulting in the erroneous order dated 3-12-99. This Court treats it to be a case of gross misconduct on the part of Mr. Agrawal personally, condemns his conduct, and administers a severe warning on him with the hope that he shall hereinafter conduct himself with the dignity and the sense of responsibility expected of him as lawyer and officer of this Court. Taking into account the overall view of the situation and in view of the remorseful confession of Mr. Agrawal. I accept the unconditional apology of Mr. Agrawal leave the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates