2018 (9) TMI 1862

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... whatsoever has been indicated by the DRI and furthermore, that the DRI has also expressed no objection for the release of the goods upon payment of the differential duty, if any, the imported goods should be released to the present petitioners who are undoubtedly the actual beneficiaries of the import. In the event, the petitioners deposit the differential duty, the goods shall be released within .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... an Swaroop Shukla, Central Government Standing Counsel, Mr. Satish Aggarwala, Senior Standing Counsel and Mr. Sanjeev Narula, Senior Standing Counsel accept notice on behalf of Respondent Nos.1,2 and 3 respectively. The petitioner is aggrieved by the terms of detention of the goods i.e. imports consignment imported through Bills of Entry dated 11.10.2017; the importation by M/s Manoj Ent .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nsel for the Revenue contended that if the importer i.e. the IEC Holder purchases it, the goods could be released. This Court is of the opinion that since the goods have been in detention for more than a year and no irregularity of any kind whatsoever has been indicated by the DRI and furthermore, that the DRI has also expressed no objection for the release of the goods upon payment of the differe .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X