9911796707
TMI Blog2019 (8) TMI 128X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... (JUDICIAL) And SHRI ANIL G. SHAKKARWAR, MEMBER (TECHNICAL) Ms. Shaivya Agrawal (Proxy Counsel) for the Appellant (s) Shri S.K. Singh, Singh, Authorized Representative for the Respondent ORDER MRS. ARCHANA WADHWA : The matters have a chequered history. The appeals were filed in the year 2008 and thereafter were being listed for disposal repeatedly. As the appellants were not represented and w ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Though the said plea of the assessee was not appreciated, but in the interest of justice the order of dismissal was recalled and the appeals were restored. 3. Thereafter the matters were listed before Division Bench on 31 October 2018, when Ms.Shaivya Agrawal, Proxy Counsel appeared and sought adjournment. The matter were adjourned to 1 November 2018. Thereafter on 1 November 2018 again Proxy Cou ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... but were adjourned at the request of the appellant. Though we are of the view that the matters again are required to be dismissed for non prosecution as it seems that appellant are not interested in perusing the appeal but in the interest of justice, we adjourn the same once again to 19 June, 2019 but way of last chance." 4. On 19 June 2019, the appellant again requested for adjournment, which re ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Ms. Agrawal does not have Vakalatnama of the appellant so as to represent their case, the learned Advocate fairly agrees that no Vakalatnama is available with her. Accordingly she prays that the matters may be adjourned and she would produce the Vakalatnama on the next date of hearing. 6. The said request of the learned Advocate stands strongly opposed by the learned Authorized Representative Shr ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e that the last order was passed on 19 June 2019 with al most one and a half month's time to the appellants, during which they could have executed Vakalatnama in favour of Ms.Shaivya Agrawal. Having not done that, the appellants are guilty of delaying the disposals of the appeals. All the above facts compel us to dismiss the appeals again for non-prosecution. We order accordingly and dismiss all t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
