9911796707
TMI Blog2019 (8) TMI 328X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ispute, we hold that the application under Section 9 was not maintainable. Appeal dismissed. - Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 697 of 2018 - - - Dated:- 6-5-2019 - Mr S. J. Mukhopadhaya, Chairperson And Mr A.I.S. Cheema, Member (Judicial) For The Appellant : Mr. Anandini Kumar and Mr. Rohan Deshpande, Advocates For The Respondent : Mr. Darpa ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... into the question of maintainability as we only look into the question as to whether there was a debt and/ or there is an existence of dispute. 3. The claim of the Appellant is that it facilitated the Corporate Debtor to get loan from the Financial Creditor and is entitled for its fee (fee as an agent/ facilitator) which has not been paid since 2015. There being a default the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Iyers Chambers, Advocates for Substantia Capital Services Pvt. Ltd. No.9, Sarayu Ground Floor, Plot No. 561/562, 11th Road, Chembur Mumbai 400 071 Dear Sir, Ref: Your letter/ legal notice dated 6th October, 2016 xxx ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... espect of whom it is claimed in the letter under reference that a deal was closed and funding as required, was obtained, entirely due to the efforts of your client which is completely contradictory to the situation in the year 2015 and the statement made by the Director of your client. At that time, Mr. Chagnani also informed Mr. Bhavik Bhimjyani that he should consider alternate back up financing ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
