9911796707
TMI Blog2019 (8) TMI 479X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... OR COMMERCIAL TAX TG ORDER: (per the Honourable Sri Justice Sanjay Kumar) The challenge in this writ petition is to the assessment order dated 28.03.2014 of the Commercial Tax Officer, Malkajgiri Circle, Hyderabad, under the A.P. VAT Act, 2005 in relation to the tax period 2009-10 to 2012-13. By the said order, the petitioner company was found liable to pay tax dues aggregating to Rs. 8,53,02 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ncy of this writ petition. Sri S. Ravi, learned senior counsel, would assert that the impugned assessment order was in the nature of an ex-parte order as the material filed by the petitioner company was not taken into consideration. He would however concede that as per the counter affidavit filed by the respondents, they claimed that the said material was not available with them. This disputed ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the conditional interim order passed in this writ petition not being complied with. Therefore, giving an opportunity to the petitioner company to establish its case at this stage would not adversely affect the interest of the revenue. The writ petition is accordingly allowed setting aside the impugned assessment order dated 28.03.2014 passed by the Commercial Tax Officer, Malkajgiri Circle, Hyde ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... nt by the petitioner company. Any amounts already deposited by the petitioner company in relation to the subject tax periods covered by the impugned assessment order dated 28.03.2014 shall be given due credit while computing the amount to be deposited in terms of this order.
Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand disposed of. No order as to costs. X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
