9911796707
TMI Blog2019 (8) TMI 594X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... . J.B. Mishra for the respondent. Mrs. A.S. Pai, APP for the State. P.C: 1 The petitioner has approached this Court invoking the jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the summons issued by the respondent no.3 under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (for short 'CGST Act'). The basic contention of the petitioners is that the respondent authority ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... d ASG also contended that petitioner's involvement in the subject case is very much there and the investigation is at a preliminary stage. 3. It is further contended that petitioner is a key beneficiary and mastermind behind perpetrating the fraud involving nonexistent supply of goods of about 150 crore involving passing on of fraudulent credit of Rs. 27 crore. Mr.Singh lastly contended that offe ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... he SLP filed against the judgment and order of Telangana High Court in a similar matter where the High Court of Telangana has taken a view contrary to the view of the Apex High Court. Since the said order is passed by the Apex Court on 29th May 2019, we are not inclined to grant any protection to the petitioner from his arrest since we are bound by the order passed by the Apex Court. 5. In the li ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
