2019 (9) TMI 1030

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ised Representative :For the Respondent ORDER RACHNA GUPTA None is present for the appellant. Perusal of file shows that the appellant is repeatedly seeking adjournments since September, 2018. It is also observed that vide Order dated 03.07.2019 appellant was directed to provide the legible copies of the documents particularly Order-in-Original. But the appellant failed even to provide the said .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 15 and 20.03.2015 as were recorded under Section 108 of the Customs Act, 1962 that the differential duty of Rs. 3,57,973/- was confirmed. We also observe that the same stands deposited vide TR6 Challan No. 22082 dated 20.03.2015. Thus, seeing from the merits as well we do not find any justification in the impugned Appeal. 3. As a result of entire above discussion, the Appeal in hand is dismissed .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X