2019 (10) TMI 519

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ry for the petitioners to pay 20% of the total demand, as a condition for stay of the balance 80% of the demand arising from the assessment order during the pendency of the appeal - HELD THAT:- Ext.P9 order is a laconic one bereft of any reasoning, and hence, cannot be legally sustained. Therefore quash Ext.P9 order, and direct the 1st respondent to pass fresh orders on the stay petition after hea .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Petitioners : ADVS. SRI. A. KUMAR, SRI. P. J. ANILKUMAR, SMT. G. MINI(1748), SRI. P. S. SREE PRASAD, SHRI. ABRAHAM JOB AND SRI. AJAY V. ANAND For The Respondents : SRI. JOSE JOSEPH, SC, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT JUDGMENT The challenge in the writ petition is against Ext.P9 order passed by the 1st respondent, in a stay application filed along with .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... aking note of the decision of this Court cited supra, I find that Ext.P9 order is a laconic one bereft of any reasoning, and hence, cannot be legally sustained. I therefore quash Ext.P9 order, and direct the 1st respondent to pass fresh orders on the stay petition after hearing the petitioners. To enable the 1st respondent to do so, I direct the petitioners to appear before the 1st respondent, at .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X