TMI Blog2019 (10) TMI 1039X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... x, Rohtak vide letter dated 16.9.2019(P-1) to withdraw the present appeal as the penalty involved is ₹ 2 lacs only. The application is supported by an affidavit of the counsel for the petitioner. Appeal dismissed as withdrawn. - CEA 18/2012 (O&M) - - - Dated:- 17-10-2019 - Justice Jaswant Singh And Justice Ramendra Jain, JJ. For The Appellant : Mr.Tajender .J ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ment and in holding that the same can be recovered only for the normal limitation period particularly when the demand has been held to be correct on merits, even when details privi of the party were neither disclosed to the department for correct assessment nor they themselves do so despite an undertaking to this effect given vide letter dated 30.4.2002 which they never provided and misled the dep ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|