9911796707
TMI Blog2018 (3) TMI 1820X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... al of office objections - seeking condonation of delay of 286 days in seeking to set aside the self-operating order passed by the Prothonotary Senior Master - HELD THAT:- We find that at the time of passing of the order dated 12 th January, 2016 by the Prothonotary Senior Master, the appellants were represented. The affidavits-in-support of the Notices of Motion are bereft of any particulars ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... and adopt such tactics deliberately, then, we do not think that the Court is responsible for the same. All the three Notices of Motion are dismissed . - M.S. Sanklecha, And Sandeep K. Shinde, JJ. Ms. Padma Divakar, for the Applicant/Org. Appellant in all the matters. Ms. Usha Vishwanathan, for the Respondent in all the matters. ORDER P.C:- These three Notices of ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ven attempted to be offered for the delay. 3 In fact in identical circumstances, our Court in Commissioner of Income Tax V/s. Reliance Industries Limited [2017] 84 taxmann. Com 313 (Bombay) had made the following observations: 8. We have found that if the number of appeals filed by the Revenue are approximately thousand per year or more, then, we expect the Revenue to appoint and deput ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... sness of the Revenue officials. Their attitude shows that they are not at all vigilant and interested in pursuing the cases filed by the Department involving a tax effect of crores of rupees. They expect the Court to be lenient and liberal and pardon them every time. It is this approach of the Revenue officials which is not only strongly deprecated in the earlier order but this Court has refused t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
