TMI Blog2019 (11) TMI 968X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... on the writ petitioner - HELD THAT:- There is no disputation or disagreement before this Court as between both the Learned Counsel that the instant case stands covered by the earlier order and there is no disagreement that earlier order made by a Hon ble single Judge has been given a legal quietus. It has not only been given legal quietus, but has been acted upon and refund after deducting penalty ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... es, the main writ petition is taken up, heard out and is being disposed of. 3. The writ petitioner arrived at Hyderabad airport from Dubai on 19-4-2018 and dutiable goods being gold/gold jewellery were seized from the writ petitioner. 4. Considering the narrow scope on which the instant writ petition now turns, it may not be necessary to advert to details of seizure with elaborat ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... f the writ petitioner that the writ petitioner approached the respondent for redemption and the respondents vide communication dated 22-4-2019 (third respondent to be precise) informed the writ petitioner that the consignment seized from writ petitioner has since been sold and an amount of ₹ 2,48,21,820/- has been realized. Therefore, the redemption option stands foreclosed. What remains now ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... upon and refund after deducting penalty has also been given to the writ petitioner therein pursuant to the earlier order. 10. In the light of the narrative thus far, the following order is passed : (a) Fourth respondent is directed to pay to the writ petitioner money realized by selling the consignment seized from the writ petitioner after deducting the penalty of ₹ 20,00,0 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|