TMI Blog2019 (11) TMI 968X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... n record for writ petitioner is before this Court. Mr. M. Santhanaraman, Learned Senior Standing Counsel on behalf of all the four official respondents is before this Court. 2. With the consent of Learned Counsel on both sides, the main writ petition is taken up, heard out and is being disposed of. 3. The writ petitioner arrived at Hyderabad airport from Dubai on 19-4-2018 and dutiable ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... d Act. 6. There is no dispute or disagreement before this Court that the aforesaid order dated 15-2-2019 has attained finality or in other words, has been given legal quietus. 7. It is the case of the writ petitioner that the writ petitioner approached the respondent for redemption and the respondents vide communication dated 22-4-2019 (third respondent to be precise) informed the writ ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... by the earlier order and there is no disagreement that earlier order made by a Hon'ble single Judge has been given a legal quietus. It has not only been given legal quietus, but has been acted upon and refund after deducting penalty has also been given to the writ petitioner therein pursuant to the earlier order. 10. In the light of the narrative thus far, the following order is passed : ( ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|