9911796707
TMI Blog1993 (9) TMI 102X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... -74, the Income-tax Tribunal, pursuant to a direction issued under section 256(2), has referred the following three questions to this court : " 1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the customs duty of Rs. 3, 02,837 that was paid by the assessee-firm outside India was an expenditure entitled to weighted deduction under the provisions of section 35B(1)(b) of the, Income-ta ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... laimed weighted deduction under section 35B by contending that the customs duty so paid was an expenditure which had been incurred, in relation to distribution, supply and provision of goods outside India. The Income-tax Officer did not accept this contention, but the assessee was successful in its appeal before the Appellate Assistant Commissioner. The Revenue then filed a second appeal and the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ion, the money which was spent by the assessee was clearly an expenditure incurred in relation to the distribution, supply and provision of goods outside India. The goods having been exported from India were to be sold abroad. Without incurring the expenditure of payment of customs duty the said goods could not be distributed, supplied or provided to the markets outside India. A similar situation ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ia [1983] 140 ITR 532 (Delhi). just as the assessee in that case paid customs duty in the U. S. A., in the present case, the customs duty has been paid in Japan and in Canada. The goods could not have been supplied or provided without the assessee incurring this expenditure outside India. The assessee was, therefore, entitled to the benefit of the weighted deduction under section 35B of the Act. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
