TMI Blog2019 (11) TMI 1053X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ent of duty? - HELD THAT:- The issue is decided in the case of SOUTHERN BAGS AND CHEMICALS PVT. LTD. VERSUS COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, TIRUNELVELI [ 2017 (12) TMI 6 - CESTAT CHENNAI] where it was held that the input was thereby an intermediate manufactured in the factory of the appellant and was not at all covered by the barring clauses contained in (i), (ii) and (iii) and (iv) of Col.2 of t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... by the decision of the Tribunal in the case of Southern Bags and Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. Vs CCE Tirunelveli 2017 (12) TMI 6 CESTAT Chennai. 3. Ld. Counsel Mr. V.Ravindran appeared for the appellant. 4. Ld. A.R Ms. K.Komathi appeared for the department. 5. Taking note of the fact that the issue is covered by the decision cited supra, we are of the co ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|