9911796707
TMI Blog2019 (12) TMI 1072X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... d Judge in the matter is against the appellant raising contention based on the question of limitation. Therefore, it is evident that the appellant will get an opportunity to oppose the proposal for confiscation on all the grounds available, except the question of limitation - we do not think that the appellant would have any grievance about the judgment. He will be at liberty to raise all the cont ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... n. 2. Ext.P7 order passed by the 2nd respondent directing confiscation of a 'used dialysis machine' imported by the appellant, under Section 111(d) alleging violation of Basel No.1110 of the Hazardous and Other Wastes (Management and Transboundary Movement) Rules 2016; and also the imposition of penalty to the tune of ₹ 75,000/- on the appellant under Section 112(a)(i) ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... tioner intimating about the proposal for confiscation on the grounds available and to proceeded to re-adjudicate the matter afresh, after hearing the petitioner. 3. The only restriction imposed by the learned Judge in the matter is against the appellant raising contention based on the question of limitation. Therefore, it is evident that the appellant will get an opportunity to oppo ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... dent, we are of the opinion that it is reasonable to put a time limit for completion of the proceedings by the 2nd respondent. Hence, while dismissing the appeal, we direct the 2nd respondent to complete re-adjudication as directed above, at the earliest possible, at any rate, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment. - - TaxTMI - TMITax ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
