Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2019 (8) TMI 1452

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... here are overwhelming evidences and assessee is unable to establish genuineness of sale and purchase of alledged scripts, adverse view would be taken by holding the transaction to be sham. AO is directed to provide all statements recorded by investigation wing to assessee, referred to in assessment order. In the event, statements recorded are not of secondary and subordinate category, cross examination has to be granted to assessee. AO is directed to re-examine the case of assessee in the light of aforestated direction in accordance with law. Needless to say that proper opportunity shall be granted to assessee to represent its case as per. Assessee s appeal stands allowed for statistical purposes. - ITA No. 699/Bang/2019 - - - Dated .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... er consideration. Assessee submitted before Ld.AO that transaction of sale was done through recognised stock exchange openly, and he was unaware of the scrip being a penny stock company. 2.2. It has been submitted that assessing officer concluded the assessment by holding that the transaction in the share price of M/s Sunrise Asian Ltd is not owing to commercial principles and market factors and that assessee resorted to a preconceived scheme to procure long term capital gains by way of price difference in share transactions. Ld.AO also held that assessee did not discharge his onus of proving the rise in share price to be natural and based on market forces, and, in view of order of SEBI finding that company Sunrise Asian Ltd., .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ssessing officer refuses to produce an informant for cross-examination by the assessee there cannot be any violation of natural justice. 6. Further in case of GTC Industries Ltd. V. Asstt. CIT reported in (1998) 60 TTJ (Bom-Trib) 308 , it has been held that, where statement and report of third parties are only secondary and subordinate material which were used to buttress the main matter connected with the quantum of addition, denial of opportunity to cross examine third parties did not amount to violation of natural justice. Each case has got to be decided on facts and circumstances of that case. Thus in our considered opinion, relevant factors to be considered are surrounding circumstances, objective facts, evidence adduced .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates