9911796707
TMI Blog2020 (2) TMI 242X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... d cannot be considered as mandatory but it was more of a direction in the interest of the Respondents. Therefore, on this ground alone, the enquiry cannot be quashed. In the reply affidavit the Respondents have explained the reason for delay. They have referred to the proceedings taken place at Jodhpur. Considering the explanation, it cannot be said that there is gross delay and a complete fail ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ARNIK, JJ. Mr. Anil Balani i/b. Devraj Kansara for the Petitioner Mr. Pradeep Jetly for the Respondent No.2. P.C. :- By this Petition the Petitioner has sought a writ for quashing the enquiry conducted against the Petitioner pursuant to an order dated 20 November 2014. 2. The Petitioner is a holder of Customs House Agents License (CHAL) for Custom Brokers License (CBL) issued ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... n 90 days. Since the enquiry is not being completed, the present Petition is filed on the ground that delay has prejudiced the Petitioner as well as it is in breach of the mandate laid down by the Tribunal. 4. We have heard the learned Counsel for the parties. 5. As far as the directions of the Tribunal is concerned, the same has to be read in the context of the order passed by the Tribunal. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Heard learned Counsel for the parties. 2. After hearing the learned Counsel for the parties, we are not inclined to accede to the request of the Counsel for the Petitioner to quash the inquiry proceedings on the ground of delay and at the same time inquiry which has been pending for long time should be concluded at an early date. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner seeks time to info ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
