1992 (1) TMI 42

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ax Act, 1961 (in short " the Act " ), by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Cuttack Bench (in short " the Tribunal " ) : " (1) Whether, under the facts and circumstances of the case, the learned authorities below are correct in law in, including the salary income of the assessee in his hands in place of his wife? (2) Whether, under the facts and circumstances of the case, the amended provision .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... cepted by the Assessing Officer who was of the view that the salary was earned because of professional knowledge and experience of the assessee and, therefore, the proviso to section 64(1)(ii) was applicable. In appeal, the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), Orissa, affirmed the conclusion of the Assessing Officer holding that, even if Smt. Shila Sahu was a member of the board of directors and .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... r and, therefore, the income has been rightly assessed in the hands of the assessee. Unfortunately, the Tribunal did not consider the applicability of the proviso on which the departmental authorities based their conclusions. If the proviso has application, the question whether the Explanation 1 as amended with effect from April 1, 1980, would be applicable would be only of academic interest. The .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X