9911796707
TMI Blog2011 (5) TMI 1105X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... itions and they are dismissed accordingly. However, we grant six months' time from today to the petitioner to vacate the premises in question on furnishing usual undertaking before this Court within six weeks from today. From a perusal of the above order, it is evident that the tenant had to vacate the premises in question within six CONTEMPT PETITION(C) NOS.140-144/2011 months' from the date of dismissal of the special leave petitions and to furnish usual undertaking within six weeks from that date. It is extremely unfortunate that neither an undertaking was furnished nor did the tenant vacate the premises in question on the expiry of six months, i.e., 06th April, 2011. Instead, frivolous objections were filed in the execution ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... premises in question on furnishing usual undertaking before this Court within six weeks from that date. Despite that Order, the petitioner in the original Special Leave Petitions Nos. 27755-27759 of 2010 has not vacated the premises in question nor did it file any undertaking before this Court. Instead, to frustrate the Order of this Court dated 06.10.2010 it got some persons to file frivolous objections before the executing court. One objector is none else than the son of one of the trustees of the tenant-trust, another objector is one of the trustees claiming to be the sub-tenant. In our opinion, such conduct is contemptuous and is simply unacceptable. It prima facie seems to us that the alleged contemnors are only creating frivolous ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... immediate suspension. Notice may be served dasti to Mr. Ashwani Kumar, Advocate-on-Record for the petitioner in the original Special Leave Petitions Nos. 27755-27759 of 2010. Copy of this Order shall be given to the alleged contemnors and Archna Sinha, Additional District Judge Central, Delhi, forthwith. Today, when the case was taken up for hearing at 11.25 a.m., senior counsels appeared on behalf of the alleged sub-tenants and stated that their clients will vacate the premises. Hence, we directed that possession be handed over to the landlord by 12.30 p.m. today and we directed this case to be put up again before us at 12.30 p.m. today. In this case, the order of this Court dated 06th October, 2010 has been totally flouted ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... lly void. We further direct the Hon'ble Chief Justice of the Delhi High Court to enquire into the matter and take such disciplinary action against Archana Sinha, Additional District Judge, as the High Court deems fit. Let a copy of this order be sent forthwith to Hon'ble the Chief Justice of the Delhi High Court for appropriate orders on the CONTEMPT PETITION(C) NOS.140-144/2011 administrative side against Archana Sinha. We are informed at 12.30 p.m. today that the possession of the property in dispute has now been delivered to the landlord. In view of this, the contempt notice against the contemnors is discharged. Mr. Dushyant Dave, learned counsel for the landlord/petitioner stated that the tenant has not paid electric ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
