TMI Blog2018 (12) TMI 1776X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... llans. Appeal dismissed - decided against Revenue. X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... provision of Section 11AA has also invoked. The matter has been adjudicated by the learned Commissioner vide his order dated 31 February 2018 whereunder a central excise duty amounting to ₹ 1,25,23,226/- has been confirmed and equal amount of penalty has also been imposed. The respondent/assessee has approached the Commissioner (Appeals) against the abovementioned order-in-original and learned Commissioner (Appeals) has allowed the respondent/assessee's appeal following the judgment of this Tribunal in the case of M/s Pioneer Engineering Industries vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Indore in Central Excise appeal No. 51973 of 2017, the decision of M/s Pioneer Engineering Industries was based on the decision of this Tribunal in the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... y in the form of remission of Sales Tax subject to the conditions to be fulfilled…. The subsidy in the form of remission of sales tax was in fact a percentage of capital investment… Separate assessment orders were thus issued by the assessing officer of the sales tax department from time to time towards the incentive scheme amount. The Competent Authority was required to necessarily pass order for remission of such tax separately for each tax period. The remission of tax is thus directly related to capital investment in fixed asset. There was no option to claim exemption from payment of sales tax. The quantum of remission was based upon the investment made in the fixed assets. The condition of the remission amongst others incl ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|