9911796707
TMI Blog2019 (1) TMI 1721X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Per N. K. Saini, Vice President: This is an appeal by the assessee against the order dated 29.05.2018 of ld. CIT(A)-5, Ludhiana. 2. The only grievance of the assessee in this appeal relates to the confirmation of penalty levied by the AO u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act). 3. Facts of the case in brief are that the assessment in this case was framed u ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... se he has mentioned both the limbs i.e. the assessee concealed the particulars and furnished inaccurate particulars of his income. The ld. CIT(A), however, did not find merit in the submissions of the assessee and confirmed the impugned penalty levied by the AO. 5. Now the assessee is in appeal. The ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that the AO while initiating the penalty proceedings has no ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... by the AO and sustained by the ld. CIT(A) was justified. 7. We have considered the submissions of both the parties and perused the material available on the record. It is noticed that an identical issue having similar facts has been adjudicated by the ITAT Delhi Bench 'A', New Delhi in the case of Aman Mehtani Vs DCIT (supra) wherein one of us (Vice President) is a co-signatory in the said order ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the assessee holding the notice issued by the Assessing Officer under Section 274 read with Section 271(l)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short 'the Act') to be bad in law as it did not specify which limb of Section 271(l)(c) of the Act, the penalty proceedings had been initiated i.e., whether for concealment of particulars of income or furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income. The Trib ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
