TMI Blog2020 (2) TMI 1049X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... it was found carrying goods in violation of the Act of 2017. The petitioner alongwith owner of the goods was served with the notice before seizure of the goods. The petitioner is the owner of the vehicle but he failed to prove that he had no knowledge about the goods carried in the vehicle so as to discharge his burden as otherwise envisaged under the Act of 2017 - In absence of discharge of burd ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... r and appeared before the competent authority with a request to release the vehicle. 2. The prayer made by the petitioner was not accepted by the respondents and accordingly and in absence of the payment, the vehicle could not be released. The amount demanded by the respondents is huge. It cannot be satisfied by the petitioner thus, he is unnecessarily suffering on that count. 3. The prayer ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... se where a vehicle alongwith goods were seized when it was found carrying goods in violation of the Act of 2017. The petitioner alongwith owner of the goods was served with the notice before seizure of the goods. The petitioner is the owner of the vehicle but he failed to prove that he had no knowledge about the goods carried in the vehicle so as to discharge his burden as otherwise envisaged unde ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|