9911796707
TMI Blog2020 (5) TMI 198X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... against the impugned order dated 02.05.2018 passed by National Company Law Tribunal, Mumbai Bench, Mumbai in CP No.45/111A/MB/2011. The relief sought by the Appellant is to set aside and/or quash the impugned order dated 02.05.2018 passed by the NCLT Mumbai; to direct the Respondent No.1 to register the transfer of 700 shares in the name of Appellant and also issue original share certificates in the name of the Appellant and also to rectify the Register of Members by entering the name of the Appellant with a holding of 700 shares in the Register of Members. The Appellant has further sought relief to pay and give all corporate benefits including all dividends accrued in the past and all such dues against the shares of the Appellant. 2. The ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... cost was stayed at the superior court but in any case the matter travelled from Junior Civil Judge Kamareddy to Hon'ble High Court and thereafter to Hon'ble Supreme Court but finally the transfer has been effected. 4. Similarly in this case also the Appellant has filed Civil Suit in the court of Junior Civil Judge, Kamareddy, being OS No.73/1999 for declaration that the Appellant is the lawful owner of shares and for direction to effect transfer of shares in her name. The Appellant was decreed Ex-parte by the aforesaid court vide order dated 31st January, 2000. Thereafter Respondent No.1 filed petition to set aside the ex parte decree passed I.A No. 288 of 2006 in O.S No.73/1999 and the same was dismissed on the ground of delay 2611 days ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... res is only a Civil Court and not a Tribunal. 7. Respondent No.2 has not been represented in this case inspite of serving notice through newspapers and other way as confirmed by the petitioner on 21.1.2019. Thereafter the case was listed on several dates viz. 06.02.2019, 18.02.2019, 13.03.2019, 29.03.2019, 25.04.2019 01.05.2019, 07.05.2019 17.05.2019, 11.07.2019, 19.07.2019, 14.08.2019, 02.09.2019, 13.09.2019, 01.10.2019, 25.10.2019, 25.11.2019, 03.12.2019, 09.12.2019 & 09.01.2020 but the counsel for the Respondent No.2 has not appeared. The question is not here relating to ownership of shares but relating to transfer of shares or its rejection. 8. The steps involved in this case was when the shares were purchased through Respondent No.3 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
