2020 (6) TMI 388

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ;            Respondent Advocate: GP For Commercial Tax TG ORDER : (Per Hon'ble Sri Justice M.S. Ramachandra Rao) Heard the learned counsel for petitioner and Sri J.Anil Kumar, learned Special Counsel for Commercial Tax appearing for respondents. 2. For the tax period 2011-12 to 2013-14, the 1st respondent had passed an assessment order .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... positing 2/3rd of the Disputed Tax within four weeks, and that the tax already paid shall be given credit to. 7. Due to pressure from the respondents, petitioner had paid further 37.5% of the disputed tax pending disposal of the stay petition. The balance of 16.66% of the disputed tax was deposited pursuant to the order dt.28-020-2018 passed by this Court in W.P.No.5041 of 2018. 8. Ultimately, t .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... rds of the disputed tax, and since admittedly appeal filed by petitioner before the Telangana VAT Tribunal is still pending and if the balance tax is also permitted to be receoved, the very appeal would become infructuous, we deem it appropriate to dispose of this Writ Petition by directing stay of recovery of balance of the disputed tax pending disposal of T.A.No.98 of 2019 by the Telangana VAT A .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X