2020 (6) TMI 418

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the Appellant Shri H.S. Brar, Authorised Representative for the Respondent ORDER PER ASHOK JINDAL: The appellant is in appeal against the impugned order wherein service tax demand has been confirmed on the presumption that the appellant has earned for executing corporate gaurantee in favour of their sister concerned, therefore they are liable to pay service tax, the appellant has also soug .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... anks on behalf of their associates. Further, the appellant has also collected certain charges on account of prime location of the flats and other relevant charges from the flat owners but did not pay service tax, thereon, on pointing out by the Revenue, the appellant paid entire amount of service tax along with interest. Later on, a show cause notice was issued to the appellant to demand service t .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... how cause notices are on the basis of assumption and presumption presuming that their associates have received the loan facilities from the financial institution at lower rate, therefore, the differential amount of interest is consideration, but there is no such evidence produced by the revenue on that behalf. In that circumstances, we hold that the appellant is not liable to pay any service tax o .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X