Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2020 (2) TMI 1310

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... law, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) ('"CIT(A)") erred in upholding the action of the assessing officer in excluding interest income of Rs. 1,35,27,971 from the profits of the business for computing deduction under section 80HHC of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ("the Act"). 2. That the CIT(A) erred on facts and in law in sustaining the ad-hoc disallowance of Rs. 55,76,844 made by the assessing officer under section 14A of the Act, being 25% of the tax free dividend income earned by the appellant, on the alleged basis that some expenditure was incurred by the appellant for earning dividend income. 2.1 That the CIT(A) erred on facts and in law in not appreciating that the appellant did not incur any expenditure on the earning o .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 55,38,347/-. The assessment u/s 143(3) of the Act was made on 26.12.2006 determining total income of the assessee at Rs. 16,41,94,835/-. The assessee preferred an appeal before the ld CIT(A) who passed order on 06.10.2015 where the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed. Therefore, both the parties are in appeal before us. 5. We first take up the appeal of the revenue. 6. The first ground of appeal is against the order of the ld CIT(A) in directing the ld AO to exclude sales and excise duty as part of the total turnover for computing the deduction u/s 80HHC of the Act. 7. The assessee has sales tax of Rs. 124470737/- and excise duty of Rs. 183583593/-. The assessee did not exclude the same in total turnover for computing the deduction .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... es to the additions of Rs. 76,04,979 /- on account of disallowance of royalty. The above issue is squarely covered in favour of the assessee by the decision of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court in ITA No. 312/2015 and 538/2015 dated 04.01.2016, wherein, the appeal filed by the revenue against the order of the coordinate bench for Assessment Year 2007-08 to 2009-10 has not been admitted. The coordinate bench in that order has held that the expenditure of royalty and technical guidance fees is revenue in nature. In view of this ground No. 2 of the appeal of the revenue is dismissed. 10. In the result, ITA No. 1056/Del/2016 filed by the revenue for Assessment Year 2004-05 is dismissed. 11. Now we come to the appeal of the assessee. 12. The f .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e that above income us not "income from other sources" but a "business income". It was further countered that the decision of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court is in fact in favour of the revenue wherein, it has been held that surplus funds are parked with the bank and interest earned thereon, it has to be categorized as "income from other sources". It goes out of income derived for the "business" u/s 80HHC of the Act. 15. We have carefully considered the rival contentions. It is undisputed that the assessee has eared interest income on fixed deposit has not been challenged as being taxed under the head "income from other sources". Only in the case where the interest income is "business income" then only netting off can be allowed. In the p .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... resent case, no such satisfaction has been recorded. The ld AR relied upon the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in 402 ITR 640. 18. The ld DR vehemently submitted that the ld AO after examination has disallowed all the expenditure. The orders of the lower authorities were relied upon. It was further claimed that there is proper satisfaction recorded by the ld AO. 19. We have carefully considered the rival contentions and also perused the orders of the lower authorities. When the assessee contends before the AO, that it did not incur any expenditure for the earning of exempt income, the ld AO is duty bound to prove the explanation of the assessee incorrect with regard to examination of the books of assessee. In the present case th .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates