TMI Blog2019 (10) TMI 1283X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ent Advocate before the learned Single Judge. She was arrayed as respondent No.1 in her official capacity. It is needless to state that the writ petitions are filed against the State in the name of the office held by the concerned officer. There is no individual malice with which the writ petitions are filed. Therefore, the contention of the appellant that she was not a party and was not heard when the order was passed, is incorrect. The said submission, therefore, cannot be accepted. There are no good ground to interfere with the discretion exercised by the learned Single Judge in the said matter. The reasons assigned by the learned Single Judge does not merit any interference - appeal dismissed. X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e office held by the concerned officer. There is no individual malice with which the writ petitions are filed. Therefore, the contention of the appellant that she was not a party and was not heard when the order was passed, is incorrect. The said submission, therefore, cannot be accepted. 5. So far as reliance placed on the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court is concerned, we have considered the same. The first question as to whether she was a party or not, is since answered hereinabove. So far as the second and third points made by the Hon'ble Lordships in para-13 are concerned with regard to the evidence on record touching upon the conduct justifying the remarks and whether it is necessary for the decision of the case, are both mat ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... . The 1st respondent - Assessing Authority Ms.K.C.Sujatha, Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (Audit) - 2.4, Bengaluru, is directed to deposit the costs quantified at ₹ 50,000/- from her personal resources with the Registrar General of this Court within a period of one month from today, failing which, the same may be deducted from her salary by the Commissioner, Commercial Tax Department and the same to be paid to the Registrar General of this Court. The amount upon deposit shall be remitted to the 'Prime Minister's Relief Fund', Delhi, for meeting the costs of relief to sufferers of natural disasters." 6. Therefore points (a), (b) and (c) as narrated by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in para-13 of the judgement, has since been c ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|