Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2019 (10) TMI 1283

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ent Advocate before the learned Single Judge. She was arrayed as respondent No.1 in her official capacity. It is needless to state that the writ petitions are filed against the State in the name of the office held by the concerned officer. There is no individual malice with which the writ petitions are filed. Therefore, the contention of the appellant that she was not a party and was not heard when the order was passed, is incorrect. The said submission, therefore, cannot be accepted. There are no good ground to interfere with the discretion exercised by the learned Single Judge in the said matter. The reasons assigned by the learned Single Judge does not merit any interference - appeal dismissed.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH AN .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e office held by the concerned officer. There is no individual malice with which the writ petitions are filed. Therefore, the contention of the appellant that she was not a party and was not heard when the order was passed, is incorrect. The said submission, therefore, cannot be accepted. 5. So far as reliance placed on the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court is concerned, we have considered the same. The first question as to whether she was a party or not, is since answered hereinabove. So far as the second and third points made by the Hon'ble Lordships in para-13 are concerned with regard to the evidence on record touching upon the conduct justifying the remarks and whether it is necessary for the decision of the case, are both mat .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... . The 1st respondent - Assessing Authority Ms.K.C.Sujatha, Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (Audit) - 2.4, Bengaluru, is directed to deposit the costs quantified at ₹ 50,000/- from her personal resources with the Registrar General of this Court within a period of one month from today, failing which, the same may be deducted from her salary by the Commissioner, Commercial Tax Department and the same to be paid to the Registrar General of this Court. The amount upon deposit shall be remitted to the 'Prime Minister's Relief Fund', Delhi, for meeting the costs of relief to sufferers of natural disasters." 6. Therefore points (a), (b) and (c) as narrated by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in para-13 of the judgement, has since been c .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates